2012年3月16日 星期五

“正义面前,我不畏缩” 陈清凉秉持讲真话立场

(北海12日讯)尽管曾在参与政治辩论台上被嘘,但陈清凉不会就此害怕,“正义面前,我不会畏缩”!

身为马华槟州妇女组主席的她,将再度踏上台上与不同政党的女领袖一起“切磋”。受询及会否担心再次被其他政党的支持者嘘或恶劣对待,她直言,自己会秉持一贯讲真话的立场,就算被丢垃圾、丢鸡蛋,在正义面前也绝不会畏缩。

她坦言,自己一直以来都实话实说,也坚持自己的立场。她反问记者,“赚了全世界,赔上自己的灵魂又有何用呢?”

当然,她也希望315当晚的全民开讲,无论是主讲人和出席者都能一起理性论政,毕竟非理性的恶言或蓄意仇恨动作都不能为健康政治发展带来任何好处。

她重申,自己从政是为了正义、公平和仁爱,爱人就是要服务。她是从1985年投入义工行列至今,并在1988年加入马华,1993年开始积极活动。

“民主国家是人民做主” 手中票决定国家未来

她敦促更多女性出席这场别开生面的全女班政治论坛,突破女性一贯给人的政治冷感印象,尤其是数据显示竟有63%年轻女性没留意政治。

“就算是不要参政,但女性也应该知道,因为你手中的一票会决定我们国家的明天。民主国家是人民做主,那人民也要当个有智慧的主人。”

她不否认,一路走来都是男权社会,就算现在也仍有一些女性会受男性影响,甚至是她们手中的一票。

“我们不能相信甜言蜜语,应该要自己多听多看,因为有时眼看也未必为真,一定要自己分析,才能明辨是非。因此,女性应该要理性、有主见;如果一直被牵着鼻子走,如何独立站立起来呢?”

陈清凉:男女应互相尊重

对她而言,所谓的良性平权是互相尊重、没有歧视,各司其职,而且拥有平等机会。

“上帝创造男女,男女在生理、心理上都有各自的优缺点。所谓的平权,并不是女性也要练就一身肌肉,而是各自扮演好自己的角色,比如女性哺乳和生孩子,男性天生体格比较壮,能搬重的东西。”

互相分担家务

她再举例,目前很多家庭都是父母出外工作,所以回家后也应互相分担家务,毕竟家庭是大家一起建立的,而分担家务的爸爸也能成为孩子的榜样,日后成为有责任感的人。

期待15日

至于另3位女将吴秀丽、章瑛和陈仪乔,她都认识。因此,她挺期待315的到来,但笑言“希望会有火花,但别太火辣”,毕竟大家都是女性,不要自相残杀。

她指出,308后,政治界限犹如楚河汉界分得很清楚,类似的政治论坛或辩论都是不错的平台,而《光华日报》在308后一直举办与推动政治论坛或辩论,值得赞赏。

她认为,就算有30%固打,也要让姐妹们走出来,所以需从政治教育醒觉做起,比如多办讲座、辩论或论坛带动,鼓励她们多关心政治。

Lim Guan Eng must seek public consultation on major road construction projects – Wanita MCA Penang

Not only has Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng refused to accept the NGOs comments, he dismissed the President of the Consumer Association of Penang (CAP) Mohamed Idris by labeling him as an “old man”. This reveals his rudeness and arrogant attitude.

Mohd Iris had pointed out that recently some of the major road construction projects that the Penang state government had implemented did not go through consultation with the rakyat. Unfortunately, Lim Guan Eng refused to accept the criticism and he counters every criticism which NGOs have sought to bring to the attention of the Penang state government.

If the mega projects are built regardless of the effects against the ecosystem, it will affect the next generation. Moreover, the Penang government is going to launch a few major road construction projects.

The mega construction project only provided an ordinary report to the NGOs. The statement given to the press and the introduction by the state executive council are just very normal briefings, not a public consultation. Public consultation means the state government should collect the rakyat’s opinion and thence make the decision.

Unfortunately, Lim Guan Eng did not accept the suggestion/advice by CAP. This is parallel to the Lynas issue. Why Lim Guan Eng only knows how to protest Lynas while he himself ignoring public consultation?

Previously, CAP criticized the major projects launched by the state government which did not go through public feedback. The major projects include the 6.5km Gurney Drive-Bagan Ajam undersea tunnel, the 12 km road connecting Tanjung Bungah-Teluk Bahang, a 4.2km Gurney Drive-Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu bypass and a 4.6km Lebuhraya Tun Dr lim Chong Eu-Bandar Baru Air Itam bypass.

If the Penang government is truly implementing the Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT) policy, then they should seek public consultation before launching the projects.

陈清凉抨击冠英患上大头症 不愿接受槟消协善意的批评


(吉隆坡13日讯)马华槟州妇女组主席陈清凉抨击林冠英患上大头症,不愿接受非政府组织善意的批评,反而指责槟城消费人协会主席莫哈末依里斯一错再错,完全显露出“我说了算”的蛮横霸道的姿态。

陈情凉今日是针对莫哈末依里斯指槟政府最近的几项大型道路计划并未咨询民意一事发文告宣称,林首长不愿接受批评,一旦有人发表对槟政府不利的言论,林冠英都一律作出反击。

“倘若罔顾环境生态因素,而贸然展开大型计划,将对下一代造成影响,况且这还是槟州接下来的几项大型计划。坐上槟首长一职的林冠英也验证了官字两张口的情况。”

他补充,针对有关大型计划向非政府组织作一般汇报、向报界发表声明或在州议会里介绍也只是一般例行公事向外公布,而非向民众咨询民意。咨询民意本是槟政府应公开向公众收集意见,再做评估。

“可惜,槟消协善意的批评,林冠英却置之不理,其过度自我膨胀的感觉,犹如做了官换了脑袋的感觉。这情况等同于稀土事件,攸关全民的课题,林冠英懂得公开向莱纳斯喊话的同时,为何却可以不理槟州人的意愿?这完全验证了只许州官放火,不许百姓点灯的体态。

槟消协日前批评,州政府最近的几项大型计划未咨询民意。这些大型计划是:6.5公里长的新关子角通峇眼亚占海底隧道、12公里长的连接丹绒武雅与直落巴巷的公路、4.2公里长的连接新关子角与林苍佑大道的旁路与4.6公里长的连接林苍佑大道与亚依淡新镇的旁路。


“如果槟州政府秉持CAT政策,那在落实大型公共计划前更应该贯彻能干、公信及透明原则,推行和实施公众参与准则,而非州政府说了算的霸道行为。”

2012年2月6日 星期一

2012年2月3日 星期五

Stick with your Manifesto & keep Penang green – Wanita MCA Penang

As a Penangite, I read with sadness news reports from The Star, 31 January 2012 where at least 20 beautiful and shady Angsana trees had their main trunks “girdled”, effectively killing these trees as the main trunk is left unable to regrow from its wound.

Can the state Health, Welfare, Caring Society and Environment Committee chairman Phee Boon Poh care to enlighten Penangites if the Penang Municipal Council has conducted any investigations or taken action against these tree-destroyers considering that he had initially confessed that he knew nothing about the matter.

The Star (31 Jan 2012) had also reported that the local authorities had carried out “a ‘hack job’ of pruning Penang Island’s trees.”

The majestic Angsana trees take more than 30 years to reach their height and size. Not only are they an aesthetic sight to behold, they provide shade and a cooling effect to pedestrians and motorists given our Malaysian tropical climate where heat and humidity are the norm. These Angsana and other trees effectively improve the quality of life for the Penang populace.

The DAP election manifesto of 2008 campaigned on “A Healthy Environment for the Future Generation” where among others, the Rocket pledged to “Preserve our bio-diversity” and “Provide and protect green lungs for densely populated urban areas.”

But actions and ignorance of the local councils prove otherwise. They seem more bent on environment carnage than preservation.

Pakatan Manifestos a ploy

This proves that Pakatan Rakyat is only playing a political game when introducing the Common Policy Framework in 2009.

DAP candidates in 2008 and their manifesto had promised many things, such as the removal of carpark charges during the weekend and the abolition of the Sg Nyiur toll, neither of which have been fulfilled. Instead, in the case of carpark charges, Pakatan Rakyat has allowed car park charges to be extended until night time.

The much brandished Buku Jingga completely obliterates mention of environmental protection – perhaps this explains why the Angsana trees in Penang are being “killed off.”

Other failures of the DAP-led state govt

The incompetency of the Penang government under Pakatan Rakyat stretches from small issues such as looking after 20 Angsana trees to bigger ones such as failure to maintain the Bukit Bendera tram which has broken down time and time again and the newly built but unusable ‘Kancil’ car park, costing the state millions of Ringgit. If looking after 20 trees can prove to be too much for them to handle, what more the welfare of the Penangites? How do they expect us to trust them with our future when they have proven themselves incompetent countless of times?

Thus, I urge the DAP-led state government to keep to their promise of looking after the environment for the benefit of all Penangites and that domestic and foreign tourists visiting the Pearl of the Orient will be awed by the beauty and splendor of Penang trees which contribute to a better quality of life to urbanites.

As a heritage Angsana tree was also found “girdled” outside a luxury condominium project in Jalan Kelawei and not be by developers, the state government must also ensure development projects must not go overboard till they destroy the environment thereby jeopardising the comfort of much-sought after urban-living surrounded by lush greenery which Penang is known for.

Tan Cheng Liang
Wanita MCA Penang Chairman

2011年12月29日 星期四

DAP’s intervention in the administration of Penang is eroding the state’s power

DAP Secretary-General and Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng’s silence over the issue where DAP National Chairman Karpal Singh had asked for Penang Deputy Chief Minister II Dr P Ramasamy to resign is akin to the ostrich mentality of hiding its head whenever a problem arises.

As National Chairman of DAP, Karpal Singh has made his position very clear, that is he wishes Ramasamy to resign as DCM II of Penang, but Lim Guan Eng, who has yet to respond to the issue of allegations of corruption among Penang Pakatan Rakyat state assemblymen as it might reflect badly on his administration, tries to avoid responding to the issue.

In any incident involving the Penang state government, Lim Guan Eng has the responsibility to give an explanation to the people of Penang as their Chief Minister. He must immediately provide a clarification after the incident and explain the circumstances surrounding it. The people believe that Karpal Singh and Seri Delima assemblyman RSN Rayer will not make any accusations without proof, and Ramasamy’s speech has also clearly pointed out that DAP and the Penang state government are involved in corruption. Therefore, Lim Guan Eng’s silence on the issue makes it seem like something is wrong.

Why is it that Karpal Singh, who has nothing to do with the Penang state government, can determine that Ramasamy should resign from his position? Karpal Singh’s interference in the operation of the state’s administration is irrational and cannot be accepted, and it also proves that the Penang state government cannot make decisions independently as the decision-makers are outside from the state’s control.

We must remind Lim Guan Eng that it is the time for him to respond and to explain to the people how he is going to handle the situation. This is because it is not just an internal dispute within DAP, but more importantly, it involves the administration of the state which will affect the people of Penang.

I hope that Lim Guan Eng will not evade and ignore the seriousness of this problem. Wanita MCA Penang will not sit quietly by and we will remind Lin Guan Eng from time to time that he must provide an explanation for the sake of the people.


Tan Cheng Liang
Wanita MCA Deputy Secretary General
Wanita MCA Penang State Liaison Chairman


(吉隆坡29日讯)槟州马华妇女组主席陈清凉揶揄林冠英还是针对拉玛沙米和卡巴星相互公开吭呛事件默不作声,坚持以鸵鸟心态来回避问题。

她表示行动党全国主席卡巴星已经非常明确的表面自身立场,坚持要求拉玛沙米辞职,反而身为总秘书的林冠英却完全不做回应,事关民联州议员是否涉及贪污舞弊指责却得不到州首长的回应,整个事件的来龙去脉视乎没有那么单纯才会导致林冠英必须以回避来谈化整个事件。

“在任何涉及槟州政府的事件上,林冠英有责任向槟州人民做出解释,身为槟首长,他必须在事件发生后立即阐明本身立场,并清楚交代事件的来龙去脉,他们相信卡巴星和雷尔不会在没有充分的理由下,胡乱的做出指责,而拉玛沙米的言论也非常的明确道出行动党和槟州政府里的贪污腐败现象,因此林冠英的沉默将让整个事件更加引人遐想”。

她也质疑为何在槟州没有担任任何职位的卡巴星可以肆无忌惮的要求身为槟第二首席部长拉玛沙米辞职,卡巴星以党的名义干涉州政府的运作是非常不理智和完全不能被接受,也开启党政不分的危险例子,这将威胁到槟州政府的独立决策权力,进而削弱州政府的独立性,增加政党对州政府决策权的控制。

“我们必须一再的提醒林冠英是时候回应和向人民交代如何处理有关事件,这不单是涉及行动党内部纠纷,但更重要的是影响槟州人民对州政府的处事态度和州政府行政规范是否被干预和侵蚀”.

她希望林冠英不要再逃避问题,轻视问题的严重性,槟州马华妇女组不会坐视不理,将会不时对林冠英加以提醒,为求他能够立即的向人民做出明确的交代。

2011年12月23日 星期五

林冠英隐瞒槟债务真相 陈清凉:6亿州债转中央

马华槟州妇女组主席陈清凉驳斥林冠英声称槟州自从民联执政以来,已经成功削减6亿令吉或高达95%的州债务,全是误导人民的谎言,其目的是要让人民以为民联执政之后就成功减低州的债务。
“在201162日,隶属于槟州政府的槟州水务机构(PBAPP)通过财政部旗下的水务资产管理有限公司(PAAB)向中央提出水务重组协议。通过这项协议,双方同意针对槟州政府拖欠的水务相关联邦贷款进行全面性重组,让6亿5524万令吉的联邦贷款以免息方式偿还。”
“简单来说,就是槟州政府的上述债务已经由中央政府所承担。这也意味着,槟州政府把债务的问题都抛给了中央政府。民联一方面谴责中央政府负债205亿令吉,却选择性的不透露,实际上有6亿令吉是槟州政府造成的。”
槟城州政府声称他们拥有全国最高的债务削减幅度,但事实上这完全都是一个误导性的信息。
相反的霹雳在国阵的治理下是拥有全国最高的债务削减幅度。槟州政府把其债务从6亿令吉降至2900万令吉而大肆宣传,而霹雳州政府成功把其债务从9亿7千万令吉降至7800万令吉,却没有夸张的自我吹嘘。
槟州政府不断声称槟城之前从未取得财政盈余。但是根据该州数年间的财务报告,2008年之前由国阵执政槟城都享有财政盈余,数据如下:
2004年是2800万令吉财政盈余
2005年是8300万令吉财政盈余
2006年是1000万令吉财政盈余
2007年是4300万令吉财政盈余
打着“能力、问责及透明”施政口号的槟州猫政府本应削减政府的开销,可是,槟州的行政开销从2007年的2.52亿令吉飙涨至2009年的2.99亿令吉。
民联也宣称他们要废除预付手机服务税,可是我们不见他们把此承诺白纸黑字纳入橙皮书或民联的替代预算案。

马华博客动态目录

《马华博客动态目录》

线上人数

搜索此博客

正在加载...

关注者

我的简介

15,JALAN PAHANG, 10400 PULAU PINANG, Malaysia